Control: tags -1 confirmed On 21/03/2020 14:08, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:20 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 21/03/2020 06:33, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> Multilevel transition needed for a while including for the grpc >>> package. Rebuilt reverse dependencies on amd64 and got the following >>> results. >> >> This conflicts with the ruby transition. Can't grpc be uploaded without that >> python build-dep? Is there a reason to tie that fix to this transition? > When that's going to be finished?
When it's finished. :-) > But to answer your question, Pirate tried a new grpc version with the > protobuf version in Sid, see #946194. It was looking good first, but > was not working correctly in all cases. Do you want me to upload a > fixed (removed that Python2 build dependency) Sid version of grpc and > when the ruby2.7 transition is over do upload the more recent grpc > version from experimental with the protobuf transition? Yes, that's what I was asking for, a minimal fix for grpc with just a s/python-sphinx-rtd-theme//, if that was possible. However, after looking more closely into the conflict with the ruby transition, I don't think this will delay that one (given the protobuf dep on ruby is not versioned), and it looks quite ready (the failing rdeps are sid-only except for ignition-transport which has no rdeps in testing, and astroidmail which can be fixed. So let's go ahead, and let's get things in a good shape quickly if they turn badly so as not to delay the other transitions. Cheers, Emilio
