On Monday, March 16, 2020 3:01:18 PM EDT Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 08:00 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Monday, March 16, 2020 7:25:09 AM EDT Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > > > > wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > On 16/03/2020 12:00, Scott Kitterman wrote: > [...] > > > > > This is the next in the normal series of postfix bugfix > > > > updates. This > > > > update has a single fix for a long standing milter processing > > > > error. It > > > > should be low risk and is in Testing already. > > > > > > > > Bugfix (introduced: Postfix 2.3): panic with Postfix > > > > multi-Milter configuration during MAIL FROM. Milter > > > > client > > > > state was not properly reset after one of the Milters > > > > failed. > > > > Reported by WeiYu Wu. > > > > > > > > As usual, I have this version running on several machines of my > > > > own with > > > > no issues noted. Debdiff attached. Please approve so I can > > > > upload. > > > > > > Subject seems wrong, this is 3.4.10. > > > > > > Also your version is 3.4.10-0deb10u1, but it should rather be > > > 3.4.10-0+deb10u1 (i.e. an extra plus sign). > > > With those changes I'd ack the upload, but let's wait for an SRM to > > > confirm. > > > > Thanks. Fixed the revision. The reportbug template pulls up the > > current version of the package, which I always thought was odd. > > I think the intent was "this is an update to version X". To be entirely > honest I personally don't really pay that much attention to the version > number in the subject. > > Please go ahead.
Thanks. Uploaded. Also, upstream has ceased support for postfix 3.1, so no further non-security update for oldstable are planned. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
