On 2020-03-15 04:05, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 14, Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > The binaries should probably be moved to a different package like
> > kmod-udeb, as they conflict with busybox-udeb. Right now the kmod ones
> > are used, but it depends on the unpack order.
> Good to know after 8 years!

The issue was workarounded by mklibs which copy the system libraries
instead. But this introduce other issues.

> Should I bother at all building a kmod-udeb 
> if it is not actually used?

The kmod binaries are actually the one being used, so yes please add a
kmod-udeb.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to