On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:44:51PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I had considered that, but creating a ksh-common package for just > one file, which in addition to that is a skeleton file that is not > used during normal operation, just adduser, seems overkill. The > sequence of installing both then removing one is also expected to > occur only rarely, most users would either install one, or both, > and then keep that. I had thought that that with the Replaces on > the other packages would be sufficient. > > Is it possible to make an exception here, considering the file in > question and that it is documented?
Hi Andreas I would agree on Thorsten's point above that it would be somewhat overkill in this given scenario. Please suggest if you would be okay with an exception in this regard, or if you still feel that this needs to be addressed? thanks, Anuradha
