Package: rspamd Version: 1.9.4-2~bpo10+1 Severity: important Tags: upstream
Yesterday, I got a mail from the Listmaster Team because my server rejected the following debian-user-french mail: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/94de34b7-3d83-ba9d-49a4-254bcf3a4...@visionduweb.com After a quick investigation, I understand that was because of bayesian filters. If you think it's not possible with default configuration, I can provide more information and you can stop reading here. Else, I am horrified by such behaviour from rspamd. I consider that a mail shall only be rejected if it is indubitably spam (e.g. SPF test failure). But with Bayesian filters, it's impossible to be absolutely sure and the only valid option is to accept it. In fact, I don't expect much from this bug report. I am already quite unhappy of rspamd for other reasons, mainly because it's too slow at learning ham/spam (I configured dovecot to trigger that when I move mails from/to the Spam folder). Configuring rspamd also looks horribly complicated and my only settings are: # head local.d/* ==> local.d/rbl.conf <== enabled = false; ==> local.d/surbl.conf <== enabled = false; ==> local.d/worker-normal.inc <== enabled = false; ==> local.d/worker-proxy.inc <== bind_socket = "localhost:11332"; upstream "local" { default = yes; self_scan = yes; } (no greylisting) Whitelisting bendel.debian.org should be something doable easily but I don't know how. With this incident, I am now decided to try bogofilter. I tagged upstream because I doubt that Debian ships with different settings than upstream about this issue. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.0 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (900, 'proposed-updates'), (900, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages rspamd depends on: ii adduser 3.118 ii ca-certificates 20190110 ii libc6 2.28-10 ii libevent-2.1-6 2.1.8-stable-4 ii libglib2.0-0 2.58.3-2+deb10u1 ii libicu63 63.1-6 ii libjs-bootstrap 3.4.1+dfsg-1 ii libjs-jquery 3.3.1~dfsg-3 ii libjs-requirejs 2.3.6-1 ii libluajit-5.1-2 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-5.1 ii libmagic1 1:5.35-4 ii libpcre2-8-0 10.32-5 ii libsqlite3-0 3.27.2-3 ii libssl1.1 1.1.1c-1 ii libunwind8 1.2.1-9 ii lsb-base 10.2019051400 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1 rspamd recommends no packages. rspamd suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
