On Friday 24 January 2020 12:55:40 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Control: tags -1 + upstream > > Hi Chris, > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 06:08:47PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > forwarded 949665 > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-mtools/2020-01/msg00000.html > > Duly noted; I had assumed this to be the case; I won't hold you to your > > initial thoughts! > > > > Based on your message, I've forwarded this all "upstream" here: > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-mtools/2020-01/msg00000.html > > Thank you. I wasn't aware of AC_SYS_LARGEFILE. Thanks to Pali Rohár for > pointing this out. I confirm that after adding it to configure.in, my > proposed testcase succeeds on armhf. (It also is nice that I can just > cross build mtools from amd64 out of the box to test for this.) Please > add AC_SYS_LARGEFILE to configure.in. > > Helmut
Hello! Another option is to put into debian/rules following line: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = future=+lfs This should not require to modify upstream source code, so it could be more cleaner solution until upstream adds AC_SYS_LARGEFILE m4 macro into configure.in file. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
