reopen 950626 kthxbye On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:47:34PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > On 05-Feb-2020, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If dcut is generating commands which produce no response from the > > server that seems like a really bad bug in dcut. > The server does not process commands immediately, so there is no way > for a client (like ‘dcut’) to know whether they succeed or fail. "succeed or fail" is not the same as "produce no response". It should be possible for dcut to tell if the commands are likely to be silently discarded and avoid that. > I hope that clears up the behaviour you're seeing. This is not a bug > in ‘dcut(1)’, so I'm closing this report. No, I perfectly understand that the commands are processed in a laggy fashion. Like I say that doesn't mean that dcut should be generating command files which can produce just no reponse at all, I'd expect dcut to have a good idea before it uploads files if that will happen and take steps to avoid it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
