> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:03 PM, Todd Rinaldo <to...@cpanel.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 31, 2020, at 9:50 AM, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org 
>> <mailto:gre...@debian.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> In my understanding, ExtUtils::HasCompiler is there for situations
>> where the presence of a compiler is not guaranteed.
> 
> Right. If I don't do this then I get all sorts of testing failure reports 
> about systems which don't have a compiler.
> 
>> 
>> In Debian, we know that we have a compiler when building packages, so
>> the check doesn't bring any advantage, and unless I'm missing
>> something we could just patch it out.
>> 
> 
> Given your expertise and control over the build environment, I think its 
> perfectly reasonable for you to disable the compiler check and let it move 
> on. 
> 
> I don't think it makes sense for me to add an exception to Makefile.PL but if 
> you have any ideas, patches are welcome. https://github.com/toddr/YAML-Syck 
> <https://github.com/toddr/YAML-Syck>. 
> 
> Possibly we could enhance ExtUtils::HasCompiler to look for a environment 
> variable that indicates that it is in a build system and coerces it to pass 
> without a check. I'm speaking with the author about this now.
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> 


You can monitor this for the enhancement: 
https://github.com/Leont/extutils-hascompiler/issues/7 
<https://github.com/Leont/extutils-hascompiler/issues/7>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to