On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 19:46 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 1/29/20 10:35 PM, Svante Signell wrote: > > Source: gcc-snapshot > > Version: 1:20200124-1 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch > > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: hurd > > > > Hi, > > > > gcc-snapshot FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to missing patches for > > gccgo. Attached are the three patches needed for a successful > > build. This bug has been reported and assigned upstream, see > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93468 > > but not yet committed.
The patches have now been committed upstream by Ian. > They don't apply to gcc-10 in experimental. Close this issue? They might not apply to gcc-10, but they apply fine to 1:20200124-1. I'm still confused why you have both gcc-10 and gcc-snapshot? > > One thing is confusing: > > According to upstream you can report bugs against gcc-10, but not > > upstream. However, in Debian you have both gcc-10-* in experimental > > and gcc-snapshot in sid. Are these based on the same upstream > > sources? > > Or is gcc-10 release upstream already (I don't think so)? > > they are the same, there's some overlap. it's easier to provide > current trunk in just a single package during development. See above. Thanks a lot for your maintaining gcc, et al!
