Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Paul,
* Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> [2020-01-30 18:41]:
On 30-01-2020 07:11, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:I would like to transition pcl to the new ABI version. I tested and updated it's build-rdeps, so I don't expect any problems. Note that the new version doesn't build on armel anymore due to virtual memory exhaustion. I will ask the ftp-masters to remove the old binary after I uploaded the new version.Is the autotracker [1] correct? Then, let this bug know but you can go ahead. [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html
Good point, a rebuild of ros-pcl-conversions is needed as well, because it encodes the PCL version into it's cmake files in the binary package but doesn't depend on any .so. I don't see a way to teach that to ben, though¹. Should I fill a separate NMU request or could you schedule that one as well?
Cheers Jochen¹: I could probably list both affected packages manually, but I don't think that's a nice. Maybe we could use the buildinfo files for this in some future..
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
