Hey Guido, Guido Günther: >> would you mind uploading wlroots to unstable? I'm aware of the fact that >> upstream doesn't consider the ABI interface stable yet, but since they >> nowadays >> bump the soname when releasing a new version[1], I don't see a reason to not >> have wlroots in unstable. >> >> A major advantage of having wlroots in unstable and testing would be that we >> could provide backports of sway window manager packages to buster-backports. >> I >> know of several people (including myself) who run sway on Buster by manually >> building backported packages (or by compiling manually) and those users would >> benefit from sway backports in my eyes. > > I think we can do that for 0.10 since there were more changes regarding > this upstream. Do you intend to maintain the backports?
I just saw that 0.10 is already in the NEW queue for unstable. That's great news :) Yes, I can well imagine to take care of the wlroots uploads to buster-backports once it hit testing. Looking forward to have the sway window manager available for Debian Buster systems. Cheers jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
