Control: tags -1 +pending Hi Marc,
yes, good catch. I'm adding qtbase5-dev, libqt5opengl5-dev, and libqt5svg5-dev, which contain the #include'd headers and also pull in tools like moc. Best regards, Joachim On 25.01.20 09:40, Marc Glisse wrote: > Package: libcgal-qt5-dev > Version: 5.0-5+b1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > I notice that libcgal-qt5-dev does not depend in any way on Qt and does > not even suggest installing any Qt packages. > > Before header-only, it depended on libcgal-qt5-13, which in turn > installed several Qt dependencies, although probably not enough to do > development. It looks like the Suggestions in libcgal-demo are the only > ones that actually install Qt dev packages. > > Do you think it would make sense to have libcgal-qt5-dev recommend some > Qt packages? I don't know how much one can do with this package without > Qt (I haven't tried). > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, > 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > Versions of packages libcgal-qt5-dev depends on: > ii libcgal-dev 5.0-5+b1 > > libcgal-qt5-dev recommends no packages. > > libcgal-qt5-dev suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information >
