Arnaud, as Roland previously said, you seemed to be working on building the modules out-of-tree too, before I submited the bug nearly a month ago. But since then, nothing has happened from your side with respect to a package upload.
As we discussed a month a go, you do agree with me, that we want to have the modules built out-of-tree, so this isn't the problem. You raised concerns about rebuilding the upstream tarball with unpackaged patches, I don't agree but it is no longer the issue with my current packages (made two weeks ago). So, this isn't a problem too. Last, you said you dislike debhelper in favour for cdbs. Independent of whetever I do agree with you, the cdbs gives no possibility to build such a package. Formal request (needed for my sponsor): Do you give me the ok to upload my squashfs package. You can, still, have a look at it under: http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/squashfs/2.99+3.0/ (FYI: it is version 3.0 final, but packaged as 2.99+3.0 to not 'waste' version numbers if I'll switch to unstable when it has properly build in experimental on the architectures I don't have at home: s390, arm and mips. On all other architectures, the package built fine.) Regards, Daniel -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
