Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> writes:
> At Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:31:22 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> I tried both modes, at least to my inexpert eye they look the same.
>>
>> The hardware claims to be arm v7 (Freescale i.MX53).
>>
>> (gdb) set arm fallback-mode arm
>> (gdb) disassemble
>> Dump of assembler code for function malloc_stats:
>> 0xb6ea324c <+0>: ldr r1, [pc, #328] ; (0xb6ea3398
>> <malloc_stats+332>)
>> 0xb6ea324e <+2>: ldr r2, [pc, #332] ; (0xb6ea339c
>> <malloc_stats+336>)
>> 0xb6ea3250 <+4>: add r1, pc
>> 0xb6ea3252 <+6>: ldr r3, [pc, #332] ; (0xb6ea33a0
>> <malloc_stats+340>)
>> => 0xb6ea3254 <+8>: stmdb sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, lr}
>> 0xb6ea3258 <+12>: add r3, pc
>
> That certainly looks like a valid ARM instruction. Maybe the processor
> is expecting Thumb instructions. What does `print $cpsr` report?
(gdb) print $cpsr
$3 = 196656
(gdb)
