Hi Roberto,

> Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > > Von: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > /usr/share/man/man2/open.2.gz has (under O_NONBLOCK):
> > > "This mode need not have any effect on files other than FIFOs."
> > > 
> > > I'm almost sure that statement is false.
> > > O_NONBLOCK prevents blocking on any filehandle (files, sockets, 
> > > fifos, devices, ...).
> > 
> > Justin is on the right track in mentioning the "standard" 
> > behavior of O_NONBLOCK.  And you haven't got things quite 
> > right -- for example, O_NONBLOCK can't be used for open() with 
> > sockets, because we can't open() a socket, and O_NONBLOCK has 
> > no meaning for regular files (it is just silently ignored).  
> 
> Yes, the de jure standard as susv3 may say is that, but the de facto
> standard as _any_ modern UNIX does is the same for every type of file.
> 
> > But I agree that the man page is a bit misleading.  One might
> > get the impression that, for example, O_NONBLOCK can't be used 
> > for sockets, although we can enable O_NONBLOCK on a socket using 
> > fcntl().  And O_NONBLOCK does have meaning for some devices,
> > and sometimes has an effect for regular files.
> 
> O_NONBLOCK _always_ has an effect for regular files, it prevents
> blocking on read or write operations (as an example think in NFS or slow
> disks)

I'm not sure of the details for NFS, and probably I don't need to
worry about them anyway, as far as this page is concerned.  But
what do you mean by a "slow disk"?

> > I have made the following changes:
> > 
> > * Removed that sentence from open.2 ;-).
> > 
> > * Added a sentence noting that the effect of O_NONBLOCK
> >   for file locks and leases is described in fcntl.2.
> > 
> > * Somewhat expanded the discussion of mandatory locking in 
> >   fcntl.2.
> > 
> > The changes will appear in upstream 2.29.
> 
> You may always want to attach the patch or an URL for review.

2.29 should be out in a week or so, and I'll send a mail when it
is released; could you let me know then if anything still needs
fixing in your opinion.

> Thanks for these changes. I already knew they were misleading to many
> people.

De nada.

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 

Want to help with man page maintenance?  
Grab the latest tarball at
ftp://ftp.win.tue.nl/pub/linux-local/manpages/, 
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source 
files for 'FIXME'.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to