On Dec 22, Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > I don't immediately see which of these options is "better". Both of them > have advantages and disadvantages. For instances, the first option means > more differences between musl and glibc, which tends to make porting > harder. It will also make software built with MUSL not work on systems with passwords hashed with modern methods. But all this is up to the musl maintainer, so let me know if I should make some changes.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
