Package: spacefm
Version: 1.0.6-4
Followup-For: Bug #944205

Dear Maintainer,

Hello, thank you for looking into this.
I can still reproduce the issue from a fresh install by not choosing
any desktop environment (only selecting "standard system utilities"
during the install) and downloading just a window manager. I have
tested cwm and openbox, which both freeze and get 100% cpu.
This is cwm's gdb output [1] and this is openbox's gdb output [2].

And in case it matters here is a list of the package's I had installed
for both in order: sudo xinit spacefm firefox cwm|openbox gdb
spacefm-dbgsym libgtk2.0-0-dbgsym libglib2.0-0-dbgsym.

[1] https://paste.debian.net/1121108/
[2] https://paste.debian.net/1121109/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages spacefm depends on:
ii  desktop-file-utils        0.24-1
ii  e2fsprogs                 1.45.4-1
ii  libc6                     2.29-5
ii  libcairo2                 1.16.0-4
ii  libffmpegthumbnailer4v5   2.1.1-0.2+b1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0        2.40.0+dfsg-1
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.62.3-2
ii  libgtk2.0-0               2.24.32-4
ii  libpango-1.0-0            1.42.4-7
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0       1.42.4-7
ii  libstartup-notification0  0.12-6
ii  libudev1                  244-3
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.6.8-1
ii  shared-mime-info          1.10-1
ii  spacefm-common            1.0.6-4

Versions of packages spacefm recommends:
ii  udisks2  2.8.4-1

Versions of packages spacefm suggests:
ii  dbus    1.12.16-2
ii  eject   2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-14+b1
pn  gksu    <none>
pn  ktsuss  <none>
ii  lsof    4.93.2+dfsg-1
ii  sshfs   2.10+repack-2+b1
pn  udevil  <none>
ii  wget    1.20.3-1+b2

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to