On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 09:31:59PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Personally, I think we should just sign them both. > I tend to agree with James in which I don't consider having pdebuild > automatically sign is necessarily good practice, but guess it works in > some cases. With that, signing both would both not break whoever is > using this in some kind of automatic build system (I can imagine > somebody running pdebuild and then automatically dput somewhere with > binaries). And, one extra signature shouldn't bother anybody. > > I'm using undocumented (yay…) options of debsign to prevent messages > about files already signed (the .dsc and .buildinfo in our case). > > Could you please see the following untested patch and share your > opinions?
Hi, Mattia I have minimally checked your patch and seems to work well with --auto-debsign, everything is signed. Thanks. Regards, -- Agustin
