-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 21:33 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Sorry for taking so long, but I have the feeling that the binNMU isn't > appropriate. I take the silence from the other team members to mean > something similar.
To be honest, I'm a bit disappointed by this delay, both from the release team and the ftpmasters. I know you we're all volunteers and it's always annoying to have to handle fallout of bad stuff caused by maintainers, but waiting that long just to give a negative answer is bit frustrating. > I suggest you revert the latest changes in libusbmuxd > (e.g. with a +really version), let it migrate to testing and then do the > soname bump dance. Unfortunately, I can't just revert the patch so that means basically reverting the whole stuff to the previous snapshot (I'm not too sure how well gbp handle that), dropping all the new hardware/software support. I'll try that anyway and follow up with the soname bump dance (which likely means a trip to NEW with another delay). Thanks for the feedback anyway. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl2vHFwACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFsazAf/aEoEahYPcAzOg4p5LSwOXc83q69EyObGjk3pSWOlMhpEFtWmQczOOQnt w59s07LQIPte62KXHpABw5DYV6iVvhe7U2bz1oykCAWtEmM3dhx6MpeKhgJXQRSm j9w0uW9saB/fhwvdYo0snX1W3Oi8DcW8DTCtoBjG5WIv2T32tQ4hkQRF3P54Fl8z D3TeE3gzE38IlrwWL5kR3jk/pyUFKBwOHwI2U4GBxQ3ZK9D9BgNkfrXLjThz3QYZ whJKpoXdWtA7v7di8f6oRnPBWfCesMGfola37+CJq//vXlc50MvsfGNZ1lHlMy/M IS7d+UzyKaappPbBCN2CS4C0ev95MQ== =IAcf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
