Thomas, On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >Hi Norbert, > >cherrypy3 got python2 removed because the same happened to objgraph >before that. See: >https://tracker.debian.org/news/1060068/accepted-objgraph-341-2-source-into-unstable/ > >I don't mind reverting the change to cherrypy3, but the the work must be >done on objgraph first, otherwise cherrypy3 wont build. Though I find it >particularly counter-productive, since we're not seeing any progress >being done on calibre, neither upstream or in Debian. > >There's no need to drag your feet, or complain, it wont change the fact >that Python2 is being removed from Bullseye because it's dead upstream >on the 1st of January next year. Making artificially cherrypy3 RC buggy, >while the package is in perfect shape isn't helpful either, and this >needs to be reverted. > >Your thoughts? >Cheers, > >Thomas Goirand (zigo) > >P.S: Please don't be aggressive with me or anyone else, as you are used >to, this wont help. Doing BTS ping-pong wont help either.
I don't see any need for the kind of provocation in this mail. How does this help communication and collaboration? You may see history of problematic communications, but your own tone and words here are practically guaranteed to cause argument. Please calm it down. -- Steve McIntyre [email protected] Debian Community Team [email protected]
