On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 01:01 +0900, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> As I can see this part of the code did not change in 0.9.10.

Hi Marc,

Sorry for not responding sooner.

There are two nslcd implementations: nslcd and pynslcd. The pynslcd
implementation is more experimental and does not handle
pam_authc_ppolicy properly.

The nslcd implementation for which you filed the bug should handle the
option properly, e.g. see 
https://arthurdejong.org/git/nss-pam-ldapd/tree/nslcd/myldap.c#n587

This option has been in nss-pam-ldapd since 0.9.7 so if you are seeing
this with nslcd, could you report the exact error your LDAP server is
logging?

The pynslcd implementation does not yet support this in a released
version but I just pushed a fix to Git:
https://arthurdejong.org/git/nss-pam-ldapd/commit/?id=fea0f5e

Thanks,

-- 
-- arthur - art...@arthurdejong.org - https://arthurdejong.org/ --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to