Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 11:50:48+0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Alexandre Rossi (2019-10-02 15:04:54) > > > > > > Do you have plans/solutions regarding this issue? Is it possible > > > > > > to drop uwsgi-core dependency on libmatheval1? > > > > > > > > > > It should be as simple as not building the matheval plugin which is > > > > > not critical to uwsgi. Should I go on with this? > > > > > > > > Yeah, I just wasn't sure that it'd be an acceptable solution for you. > > > > > > > > But it's perfectly fine with me. :) > > > > > > Well, I would say "tolerable" rather than "acceptable" - it is a real > > > annoyance since it will directly remove features now offered in uwsgi. > > > > upstream says in 1.9.20 changelog: > > > > The matheval support has been removed, while a generic “matheval” plugin > > (for internal routing) is available (but not compiled in by default). > > See below for the new way for making “math” in config files. > > > > > @Alexandre: Make sure to add a NEWS entry warning users of the removal > > > of matheval - ideally enumerating explicitly all uwsgi options which has > > > disappeared and may silently wreak havoc on local systems. > > > > > > Also, better check e.g. with codesearch.debian.net if any packages rely > > > on matheval-related uwsgi config options, and if so alert them with > > > bugreports. > > > > Search on "uwsgi matheval" or "uwsgi math" yields no result. > > Ah well, seems you got better knowledge here than me, Alex :-)
Thanks for taking the time to answer. Do you require some assistance regarding a new upload of uwsgi? I'm eager to dedicate some time to it if you can't do so. :) With best regards, -- Pierre-Elliott Bécue GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528 F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2 It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
