Package: ratt
Version: 0.0~git20180127.c44413c-2+b10
Severity: important

Hi

I just found this seemingly very useful tool, and wanted to test a
package against its reverse dependencies. But unfortunately, ratt
cannot find a single one:
        $ ratt -dist unstable -sbuild_dist unstable 
texinfo_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.changes
        2019/10/07 22:43:48 Loading changes file 
"texinfo_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.changes"
        2019/10/07 22:43:48  - 6 binary packages: info info-dbgsym install-info 
install-info-dbgsym texinfo texinfo-dbgsym
        2019/10/07 22:43:48 Corresponding .debs (will be injected when 
building):
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     info-dbgsym_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     info_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     install-info-dbgsym_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     install-info_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     texinfo-dbgsym_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48     texinfo_6.7.0.dfsg.2-4_amd64.deb
        2019/10/07 22:43:48 Figuring out reverse build dependencies using 
dose-ceve(1). This might take a while
        2019/10/07 22:43:48 Build results:
        $
But there are *a* *lot* build deps on texinfo:
        $ build-rdeps texinfo
        ...
        Found a total of 570 reverse build-depend(s) for texinfo.
        ...

Am I missing something important here?

Best

Norbert

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.3.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages ratt depends on:
ii  libc6   2.29-2
ii  sbuild  0.78.1-2

Versions of packages ratt recommends:
ii  dose-extra  5.0.1-14

ratt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to