Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > fjp pointed out that it might be difficult to find a good way to drop > the libdiscover1 from the udeb's deps without hardcoding the deps or a > similar hack, so I went ahead and finished my patch to produce a nice > clean libdiscover1-udeb and make discover1-udeb depend on that. > > Note that this patch removes debian/libdiscover1.shlibs; the presense of > that file makes your existing call to dh_makeshlibs do nothing, and I > need to let dh_makeshlibs do its magic.. > > Also, note that this patch fixes the description of discover1-udeb > (which amoung other changes means removing the long description). > > And also, it redoes your rules file to take advantage of debhelper's > udeb support.
I've abused my commit rights and commited the patch, betting that you would have done so yourself, Joey, and that debhelper-related changes by the debhelper author are probably safe..:-) I'm even considering building and uploading the file if noone else cares to. However, Otavio probably can also. Otavio? My loose understanding of this bug is that it would help d-i if it is fixed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
