Hello, On Sun 01 Sep 2019 at 07:21PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I'd appreciate if you could look over these changes and tell me if you >> agree (as we both should agree on at least the list of slave >> alternatives), have alternative suggestions or otherwise comments. > > I thought about the issue of the Xsession.d file and > /etc/default/unclutter, and concluded that it could stay in > src:unclutter only. My thought was that most contemporary users of > unclutter-xfixes will probably expect to have to start the program > themselves, e.g. in ~/.config/i3/config. I was certainly surprised when > I first installed unclutter, rebooted for whatever reason and discovered > it had started itself. > > Someone who *does* want to keep using the Xsession.d file with > unclutter-xfixes can just install both unclutter and unclutter-xfixes. > > Without your additional changes on top of my patch, that will just work > (I've tested it): the priority of the unclutter-xfixes link group is 20, > such that if you have both packages installed unclutter-xfixes > automatically occupied /usr/bin/unclutter (since someone who has > installed unclutter-xfixes very likely wants to use that in preference > to unclutter-classic) but the Xsession.d file still works. > > Does this make sense to you? I'm certainly not wedded to the idea, but > I'd like to hear your opinion about it. Ping -- what do you think about this? I'd like to get src:unclutter-xfixes into NEW and it would be best to do that only after we've finished discussing src:unclutter. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
