Nathan,
Nathan Scott wrote:
Hi Pjotr,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:47:01PM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
...
This bug report could use a bit more text explaining what uclibc
is all about, for those of us who don't really know. I also have
several packages, but patches for only 2, and I'm now wondering if
I need these changes in the rest, for example.
uclibc is a lightweight alternative to glibc. I am in the process of
building a fair amount
of Debian packages with it, for e.g. i386-uclibc "architecture".
Now, both uclibc-dev and libc6-dev provide libc-dev, so attr-like
packages should
really be hosted on libc-dev rather than libc6-dev.
Updated patch to attr attached.
--- attr-2.4.25/include/builddefs.in 2004-11-28 23:32:55.000000000 +0100
+++ attr-2.4.25-1.my/include/builddefs.in 2006-03-13 12:16:02.000000000
+0100
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
ECHO = @echo@
SORT = @sort@
LN_S = @LN_S@
-LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@
+LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@ --tag BINCC
I don't understand what this part is for - could you explain
it a bit please? Also, why wasn't it needed for the "acl"
package patch (358788)?
Yes. I now found out that the problem is with libtool (will address that
separately with libtool folks),
please ignore this one.
thanks.
Pjotr
--- attr-2.4.25/debian/control 2004-04-27 01:03:41.000000000 +0200
+++ attr-2.4.25-1.my/debian/control 2006-03-13 12:38:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
Package: libattr1-dev
Section: libdevel
Priority: extra
-Depends: libc6-dev, libattr1 (>= 2.0.0)
+Depends: libc-dev, libattr1 (>= 2.0.0)
Provides: attr-dev
Replaces: attr-dev
Conflicts: attr-dev, attr (<< 2.0.0)
