Hi Vagrant,

On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 01:39:32PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-02-24, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > bzr has long been dormant upstream. It will be replaced in Debian (in
> > buster+1) with Breezy (www.breezy-vcs.org), which is actively
> > maintained and has a Python 3 port. Breezy has a command-line that is
> > backwards compatible with Bazaar.
> >
> > Please consider porting git-remote-bzr to the 'breezy' Python module
> > instead of using Bazaar's 'bzrlib'. Most of the porting process should
> > be a matter of running s/bzrlib/breezy/ on your code.
> 
> Given that git-remote-bzr provides a git frontend to a bzr repository,
> I'm not sure the backwards compatible command-line interface sounds too
> exciting... :)
> 
> I don't personally work with many bzr repositorys anymore, so I would be
> inclined to orphan git-remote-bzr to someone with a more vested interest
> if bzr/bzrlib was dropped for buster+1.
> 
> Upstream on git-remote-bzr hasn't been terribly active either:
> 
>   https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-bzr
> 
> Though it's largely continued to work, which isn't a bad sign.
Bazaar will be removed with the Python 2 transition, with transitional
packages being added to upgrade users to Breezy.

git-remote-bzr is the only remaining blocker for the Bazaar to Breezy
transition (and various plugin packages). Per the guidance in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936618, what are
your plans for the package?

Thanks,

Jelmer

Reply via email to