Quoting Thomas Goirand (2019-08-26 01:30:29) > Tags: patch Do a patch really exist covering _all_ which this bugreport covers?
My impression from your description below is that a patch exist only for parts of the problem tracked here. > As python 2 is going away from Bullseye, we should remove any trace of > Python 2 package from src:uwsgi, and also make it use Python 3 only. > > I've already opened a pull request upstream to fix (hopefuly all) of > the code regarding Python 3 compatibility: > > https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/pull/2062 > > Let's wait for a while to see if upstream merges it before fixing the > Debian package. Note that a no-py2 branch now exists in Salsa for > solving this bug, but as the patch is rather big, it'd be much nicer > if it could be first accepted upstream, and probably a new version > released. Thanks for your work on this, Thomas! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
