On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:51:44PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > But this is all pretty complicated and i'm not convinced that it is > worthwhile. It might make more sense for blhc to be able to detect > and skip these local helper tools.
Hello Daniel, while I think it would be nice if blhc could detect local helper tools I'm not sure how to accomplish this. In theory, it could track which programs are distributed but this will be quite complicated and might hide bugs where object files are (re)used in binaries which are then shipped. Suggestions are welcome of course. Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
