Hello Adam, It certainly can't be 1.3.2-1+deb10u1, as that version number is higher > than the package in unstable. Either one would need to go with 1.3.1- > 2+deb10u1 with just the bug fix applied, or 1.3.2-1~deb10u1 with a > "backports-style" changelog containing both 1.3.2-1 and then the stable > update. In either case we would need a debdiff that reflects the chosen > approach. > > One thing that will need to be fixed in unstable first either way: > > Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by samueloph > > As per the d-d-a announcement, that will need a new source upload to > unstable to resolve, as arch:all can't be usefully binNMUed. >
I just uploaded 1.3.3-1 (source-only) to unstable, can I just wait until it migrates to testing and then go with "1.3.2-1+deb10u1" ? If so, I will remove the "moreinfo" tag when it the package migrates to Testing (in 2 days) and we can use the latest debdiff on this thread. Thanks, -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
