Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 23:43 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2019-07-20 21:41:12 -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:21:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor > > wrote: > > > On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The > > > > deadline was > > > > last Tuesday, we are now in deep freeze and we were not able to > > > > process > > > > your unblock request and give it an exception. I assume this > > > > should be > > > > fixed via the security archive, please confirm that (and I'll > > > > fix this > > > > bugs metadata). Otherwise I propose you prepare a stable > > > > release update > > > > targeting buster, such that this can be fixed in the first > > > > point release. > > > > > > I'm fine with this going through either security or the first > > > buster > > > point release. So yes, Paul, if you can update this issue to be > > > treated > > > as a security issue, that would be great. > > > > Would you prefer to do this as a security upload (in which case > > this > > unblock bug should be closed) or as a no-dsa (we will repurpose it > > for a > > p-u)? > > At this point, given the upstream changes and the issues with the SKS > keyserver network, i think we should aim to import 2.0.12 into > buster, not 2.0.11. > > I would love it if someone else wants to step up and help with this. > I'm currently working on an update to GnuPG for buster, and have not > had time yet to do the 2.0.12 upload for Buster (either as a security > or point release).
Tagging as moreinfo for now, until there's a definite plan and diff either way. Regards, Adam
