Hi Jiri! El vie., 9 ago. 2019 11:21, Jiri Palecek <jpale...@web.de> escribió:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 11:45:54 -0300 > =?utf-8?q?Lisandro_Dami=C3=A1n_Nicanor_P=C3=A9rez_Meyer?= wrote: > > Source: qtbase-opensource-src > > Version: 5.11.3+dfsg1-2 > > Severity: normal > > > > Jonathan Ridell just reported that some KDE packages (and then Scarlett > checked > > that Qt has the same issue) ship the .tags files within foo-doc packages. > > Yes. I have reported that about half a year ago as 922707. > Sorry for the duplicate. We haven't got to a full bug triage since the freeze, so we might miss some bugs. > It turns out that the .tags files are used for linking docs, thus more of > a > > development file. > > Yes. And generated apidocs in debian-built packages are suboptimal because > of this. > Correct. Hopefully this will get solved soonish. > > We need to consider if we have to move this files or not within Qt. If > we have > > then we might tackle the xml files for examples too (see #933597). > > This change is already commited in the Salsa repository. > Right, Scarlett went ahead with them, thanks Scarlett! BTW the other culprits in this business are: > [Snip all doc packages] Do we need a separate bug for every one of them? > Ideally one per qt submodule source package that ships -doc packages. But not entirely necessary now it's on our radar Thanks, Lisandro. >
