This bug has been on my peripheral vision for a wee while, I’ll have a prod at it tomorrow night and get it uploaded. At least now I don’t need to check uronode too!
Cheers, — Hibby MM3ZRZ > On 4 Aug 2019, at 18:33, Iain Learmonth <i...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 04/08/2019 16:59, Christoph Berg wrote: >> Isn't that moving into the wrong direction, FHS-wise? > > Yes, but I think that if someone really disagrees here then I would want > tech-ctte to rule on it or something. > > Changing all the other packages is going to use up a lot of time that > could be used instead for improving the technical quality of the > packages through testing, bug squashing and documentation instead of > chasing down bugs triggered by moving the whole folder structure. > > All the other packages use /var/ax25 and have for *decades*. Custom > software people build is expecting /var/ax25. > >> But judging from the file names, these look like they should be in >> /usr/share instead. > > The goal of the bug is to remove the last of /var/lib/ax25 from the > archive, if the files move to /usr/share then that is also fine with me. > (It does look to be a better place for them, but I don't know what they > do or why they are there, maybe there is good reason.) > > Thanks, > Iain. >
