Sam Hartman wrote:
> Chris> My experience of Lintian suggests that W: would be too strong
> Chris> to start with. Sam, would you be okay with "I:" to begin
> Chris> with?
[…]
> I personally don't think this makes a lot of sense as an i: tag, but
> that's not my call to make.
Can you elaborate why you think it would not make a lot of sense? Tags
with "I:"-level severity get a lot of visibility and people make
substantive changes if they see them. And, sardonically-speaking, the
Lintian maintainers get reports close to flames for pedantic
level... :)
(Oh, it is not clear to me why you would mention DPL or disavow being a
Lintian maintainer; I addressed my question to you as you filed this
bug, not in any other context or mode? I mention it in case I can
missing something...)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
