Dear BTS people, it seems as if this bug needs to be fixed on your side, see
,---- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=353741;msg=69 | the BTS sends out the mail correctly and murphy's postfix rejects it. | | Mar 23 03:27:52 murphy postfix/cleanup[31055]: C09F135994: reject: | mime-error im proper use of 8-bit data in message header: To: | Frank K??ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from | spohr.debian.org[140.211.166.43]; | from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | to=<debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org> `---- Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo! Du (Frank K?ster) hast geschrieben: > >> What exactly in "Didn't we clarify earlier in this bug that the mail >> should be sent to the maintainer, not the uploader?" do you not >> understand? ;-) > > if i understand that correctly, then it isn't a problem of > listmasters?! This I don't know. Don asserted that the mail should be sent by the BTS. We found that the mail to me was bounced because the BTS sent it with 8-bit characters in the header; whether this is also the reason why the Bcc of that mail to the maintainer is not delivered, this I don't know (but you could probably help here). There might be a different reason, too. > then i could say, proof that the mail is generated, I think if Don said "I checked the code" we can trust that it is generated. However, it would be nice if the BTS people could check their logs, if any. > but if the mail > you are missing is > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352688;msg=15 > i'd expect that the 'Kuester-Bug' strikes again. Yes, that's the mail I expected to show up on the mailing list, i.e. at the maintainer's address. So it seems that in order to fix this bug, the BTS people need to fix their encoding in the To, as you (Cord) pointed out earlier. Thanks, Frank P.S. Can you give us a hint how often "please create a new list" requests are usually processed? -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
