On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 07:36:00PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: > El 1/8/19 a las 17:43, Adam Borowski escribió: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:57:51PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: > >> * Package name : multimail > >> Version : 0.52-1
> > At a brief glance, the package seems ok, but the changelog has a lot of > > confusion wrt who's maintaining it: first there's a not-in-archive adoption > > by Robert James Clay, then your NMU, then a seemingly regular entry. > > Could you please describe that in a more obvious way? > > > > I haven't yet reviewed the package well enough for 11 years of neglect. > Yeah i think so too, Peter Karlsson was the mantainer up to 0.49 > Then, Robert try to update the package and build the 0.50 that i think > that never was included on debian archive. > > Due to lack of updates i want to try to keep the software. (and build > 0.51 and now 0.52) That's cool -- it's obvious that Robert isn't around. > Should the lines of the versions (0.50 and 0.51) be eliminated? and let > the 0.49 and 0.52? I'd preserve at least Robert's entry separately. It hasn't ever been in the archive, but I feel it may be good to have an obvious line. The other option is to use [ Someone ] notation. What I asked to clarify, though, is that it's you who's adopting the package now, as Robert's attempt wasn't completed. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian is one big family. Including that weird uncle ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ and ultra-religious in-laws. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
