On 7/31/19 3:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:55:23PM +0200, Roger wrote:
>> I have investigated more - the failing test is
>> bamtools filter -script tests/filter_script -in sam_spec_example.bam
>> -out out.bam
> Thanks a lot for your investigation. Do you think its a sensible
> idea to add some
>
> if [ $(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH) != "ppc64el" ] ; then
> bamtools filter -script tests/filter_script -in sam_spec_example.bam
> -out out.bam
> fi
>
> around the test as some temporary means?
Andreas,
That sounds a good temporary idea.
Thanks
>
>> all other tests pass.
>>
>> #----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> which traced gives
>> execve("/usr/bin/bamtools", ["bamtools", "filter", "-script",
>> "tests/filter_script", "-in", "sam_spec_example.bam", "-out",
>> "out.bam"], 0x7fffd265a250 /* 14 vars */) = 0
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=198896, ...}) = 0
>> mmap(NULL, 262552, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0)
>> = 0x7fff97cd0000
>> mmap(0x7fff97d00000, 131072, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x20000) = 0x7fff97d00000
>> close(3) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff97f20000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff97d00000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff97f60000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff980a0000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff98320000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff983e0000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff98440000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x12ce50000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> mprotect(0x7fff984f0000, 65536, PROT_READ) = 0
>> munmap(0x7fff98460000, 215211) = 0
>> brk(NULL) = 0x1001ccb0000
>> brk(0x1001cce0000) = 0x1001cce0000
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "tests/filter_script", O_RDONLY) = 3
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=352, ...}) = 0
>> read(3, "{\n \"filters\" : \n [\n { \""..., 4096) = 352
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
>>
>> ... and that forever
>> I have changed the filter_script to add more lines of data, and trace
>> shows like at the end of file it doesn't get EOF and try to read more -
>> don't understand why !
>>
>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/filter_script", O_RDONLY) = 3
>> fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=63521, ...}) = 0
>> read(3, "{\n \"filters\" : \n [\n { \""..., 4096) = 4096
>> read(3, " }\n{ "..., 4096) = 4096
>> read(3, " "..., 4096) = 4096
>> brk(0x100387e0000) = 0x100387e0000
>> read(3, " "..., 4096) = 4096
>> read(3, " "..., 4096) = 4096
>> read(3, " "..., 4096) = 2081
>> read(3, "", 4096) = 0
> I can forward this investigation to upstream if you have no better clue.
> Your result looks in any case suspicious not only for ppc64el.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
--
Thierry Fauck @ fr.ibm.com
