tags 932870 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Paul,
> autopkgtests that have Restrictions: superficial do not provide
> significant test coverage. Please add a tag that is similar to the
> testsuite-autopkgtest-missing tag that is shown when there are no
> autopkgtests that are not marked as superficial.
Parallel to my comment on #932862, what would you say to simply also
emitting testsuite-autopkgtest-missing in this case (and naturally
updating the description, etc).
What I really mean to say is that I wonder whether we should zoom out
a bit and get a good picture about what we want in this area without
any duplicative code or effort. :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
