-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi, 

Hi,

> As Gregor mentioned, the upstream bug report appears to refer to
> something entirely different. Since there's no error messages in
> this bug, I can't tell whether it's still a problem or not.  The patch
> supplied in this bug report has not been applied in the latest
> upstream release of protobuf.
> 
> I see other dlopen-related bugs upstream, but most are closed:
> https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue++dlopen+
> 
> Please let me know if this bug should still be open or not; and if
> so, which upstream bug is relevant?

This bug is already closed. There is no original bug report as we moved
from google code to github, but related bug reports are:

  https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/1941
  https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/4126

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=uCQf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to