On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > * Because this is a violation of a Policy "must" directive, I consider > the downgrade to be a tricky way to modify Debian Policy without > following the usual Policy decision-making procedure. Please also note that https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt defines bug severities, not the Policy directly. For example, while the Policy says that a package in main "must not require or recommend a package outside of main", the RC policy says ""Recommends:" lines do not count".
> Surely, the end user *must* be able to build the package as well, must > they not? I also guess it's not the only case when the buildd infra does things differently, the best known example is ignoring B-D alternatives. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
