Package: reportbug
Version: 3.18
Severity: wishlist

When using reportbug to report a problem, I often enough get 50
pages of "is your bug mentioned above?"

I understand the idea - you want to avoid duplicate reports.
But wading through all those one-liners is often too much.
In practice, I read the few first screens carefully and then skips
all the rest. I guess this is true for many other reporters as well.


I have a couple of suggestions:
1. Try harder to *not* list uninteresting bugs.  For example,
   bugs solved in a version earlier than the installed version.
   It cannot possibly be one of those, can it?

2. Please make the bugs searchable from this prompt.  I want
   to avoid a duplicate report, but I am not going to read
   carefully an unlimited list of possible bugs.

   Often I know something more, such as a particular command
   or filename that surely *must* be mentioned in any duplicate.
   So ability to set a searcfilter for showing  only bugs that contain
   a supplied string would be very helpful indeed.  And it would even
   find bugs where the one-line description is bad, but the string
   exists inside the report somewhere.

The candidate bugs for the dpkg package has many many pages dominated by
asserts in the dpkg program - none of which can possibly cover this
wishlist bug.  Actually, setting an exlusion string might be
an idea too, although dangerous.

-- Package-specific info:
** /home/helgehaf/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "2.58"
mode standard
ui text
realname "Helge Hafting"
email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
smtphost "mail.aitel.hist.no"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (800, 'stable'), (700, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  python2.3                     2.3.5-9.1  An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
ii  python2.3-iconvcodec          1.1.2-2    Python universal Unicode codec, us

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to