On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:13:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Anyway, I do think that the multiarch-style directories are the right way > forward, but it doesn't make sense to require uclibc to conform to them > before any other packages are doing so. As such, I agree with the idea of > granting uclibc an exception here *if* multiarch doesn't happen for etch; > but in the meantime, I think this bug should be kept on the radar.
I don't mind switching uclibc to a New Way Forward, as long as the solution is relatively complete. dave.. -- David Schleef Big Kitten LLC (http://www.bigkitten.com/) -- data acquisition on Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
