Hallo! Du (Santiago Vila) hast geschrieben:

> > one day every RBL goes away, and how it does this isn't predictable. i
> > remember at least one RBL, which started to respond for every request with
> > 'Spamrelay' to get rid of the users. That day (weeks) some people
> > didn'T get any spam. (they also didn't get any mails at all.) So this
> > is definitly no option for us. 
> 
> You probably refer to relays.osirusoft.com. Why do you say "weeks"?

Because i know that some users didn't notice the change for a long time.

> Are you trying to extrapolate? In such case, do you consider our
> debian admins so incompetent (so to speak) that we would not be able
> to notice about a shutdown like this in weeks? I don't think
> it is fair to extrapolate here.

yea. send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . oh. it's blocked.

> >  but again: it isn'T an option to give the main communication of
> > Debian into the hand of non-Debian parties.
> 
> Except that, in some sense, we are already in the hands of non-Debian
> parties. Just take a look at the spam stored in the list archives.

No. all filters are is in the Hand of Debian listmasters. It's our
decision how we weight suggestions from RBLs we maybe use. You suggest
that we should use an RBL as the only criteria if we accept mail or if
we bounce it.

My answer is "no, we don't want this", the other listmasters get this
discussion and didn't object, so i think that they have the same
opinion.

EOD,
        Cord

-- 
http://lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to