On 19.06.19 22:03, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 18-06-2019 22:14, tony mancill wrote: >> Things are looking good so far with 11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7 in unstable, >> and so I would like to prepare the t-p-u upload. At the moment, the >> version I have is 11.0.3+7-5, since that would have been the "next" >> 11.0.3+7 Debian revision for unstable. The 11.0.3+7 orig.tar.xz already >> in the archive is the same one used for the "really" to unstable and >> this build, and this versioning makes it clear to users what they are >> getting. The resulting changelog would be: >> >>> diff -Nru openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog >>> openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog >>> --- openjdk-11-11.0.4+4+really11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-14 >>> 12:28:25.000000000 -0700 >>> +++ openjdk-11-11.0.3+7/debian/changelog 2019-06-16 11:24:19.000000000 >>> -0700 >>> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ >>> +openjdk-11 (11.0.3+7-5) buster; urgency=medium >>> + >>> + * Team upload. >>> + * Upload 11.0.4+4+realy11.0.3+7-2 to buster t-p-u. >>> + >>> + -- tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> Sun, 16 Jun 2019 11:24:19 -0700 >> >> Is this acceptable to the Release Team? If not, (and I know there have >> been some differing opinions), how shall we version the t-p-u package? > > I think the most logical version would be 11.0.3+7-4+deb10u1, as this is > a targeted upload to buster.
let's use a version which also can be nicely used for the backports upload. > I don't have a strong opinion on it. I > still don't like it we go via tpu but I understand the ranting argument. this will be very short-lived until the final 11.0.4 release to be uploaded into security. > Let's end this saga. please do.
