On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:30:51 +0200 Fabian Greffrath <fab...@debian.org> wrote:
> It's understandable that this was introduced to avoid using the > f-word. How about replacing it with "frick" or "fsck" instead? frick seems to me to be the most appropriate fsck can cause confusion, it is not a filesystem check where is the food: what the heck? no fantasy here? what it means? how changing the meaning of an utility can be considered acceptable? if we really want to be boringly polite, then why not "what term for"? ciao :)
