Hi Reinhard, On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 07:20 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: golang-github-appc-cni > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > Please update to new upstream version of 0.7.0-alpha1. I need it as a > build dependency of http://github.com/containers/buildah
By now you could try to get 0.7.1, released a couple of hours ago: https://github.com/containernetworking/cni/releases/tag/v0.7.1 > > In fact, I've done so locally, and would be happy to upload it as a Team > Upload. I was running into issues while doing so. Unlike the git > repositories created by the dh-make-golang tool, the git repository on > salsa at > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-appc-cni does > not include full sources in the packaging branch. I am unfamiliar with > that workflow and it is inconsistent with how the vast majority of the > packages in the golang team are handled. I therefore decided to start > off from a 'dgit clone' created repository. > > Dimtry, I wonder what your thoughts on this issue are. Would you be OK > with switching the workflow? If not, could you please upload > 0.7.0-alpha1 to experimental soon? Alternatively, I could upload the > package that I have locally to experimental, and leave updating salsa to > you (or someone else) whenever time permits. > > What does the rest of the team think about competing git repository > workflows within the team? At least to me, this seems undesireable > because it prompts convesations like this (which I really don't enjoy > having). I'm also puzzled why this packaging. Just my 2 cents, although I'm not part of the team, but having a look at some packages needed for containers. > > Best, > -rt > A different, but related question. Are there any known efforts to package the reference plugins? BR, Silvano
