Santiago, Can you confirm that you were using the fuse implementation of overlayfs and not the one from the Linux Kernel?
Best, -rt On June 6, 2019 6:46:35 PM EDT, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: >Control: reassign -1 fuse-overlayfs > >[ Please check the bug report for the original problem. ] > >Hi! > >On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 10:02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: >> Hmm, I said: >> > Is dpkg in buster calling tar with any options that makes this >> > behaviour to happen more easily? Is tar in buster more prone to >this >> > failure when using overlayfs? >> >> By looking at my build logs I see that this is not really related to >> buster, but related to the fact that I started to use virtual >machines >> from Scaleway. Apparently this is really easy to happen there. >> >> Still, I would like to know if there is some kind of workaround other >> than stopping using overlayfs. > >I don't really know. I just know that overlayfs has caused compliance >problems in the past, so I'd recommend avoiding it TBH. > >I'm thus reassigning. > >Thanks, >Guillem -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
