Hi! * Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060322 22:51]:
> > D. A PNG optimizer similar called "optipng" which is similar in > > function (but not in design) to "pngcrush" has recently entered > > etch. > > pngcrush was later orphaned -- <http://bugs.debian.org/353392> -- and is > marked as being adopted by Alexander Schmehl. > > Alexander, do you still intend to adopt it? Does optipng render > pngcrush unnecessary? I have no strong feelings about pngcrush. Just used it a couple of times in the past and might need such a tool in the future, while not knowing of similar tools. It seemed to me, that no one else wanted it, so I steped in. However, I want be able to upload a fixed package till mid/end of next week. > > E. I have prepared a "pngcrush" package based on pngcrush-nolib.tar.gz. > > I am willing to adopt this package if rules do not permit an NMU > > for such major changes. > I can do a QA upload for you, but let's see what Alexander says first. If you want it, you can have it. Yours sincerely, Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
