Le 27/05/2019 à 00:14, tony mancill a écrit : > For buster, t-p-u would have a quick turn around, but there are a number > of upstream changes between 9.4.15 and 9.4.18 [1], and I don't have a > good sense for the risk trade-off between the new version and the > backport. Since I haven't handled any of the jetty9 uploads, I would > like to defer to Emmanuel to see if he has a preference.
Jetty minor updates are usually quite stable. Looking at the diff, focusing on the code built only, the upgrade to 9.4.18 is under 9K lines changed. ebourg@icare:~/packaging/jetty9 [master|⚑ 4] $ git diff -w upstream/9.4.15..upstream/9.4.18 -- ':!*Jenkins*' ':!*/pom.xml' ':!*/test/*' ':!jetty-alpn/jetty-alpn-conscrypt*' ':!jetty-hazelcast/*' ':!jetty-ininispan/*' ':!tests' ':!jetty-maven-plugin/*' ':!jetty-jmh/*' ':!examples/*' | wc 8698 30628 355212 If the Release Team agrees I wouldn't mind pushing 9.4.18 to testing. Emmanuel Bourg
