Thorsten Glaser wrote: > This (#929185) may also affect timidity, which has its own format, > but with a trivial config file can support any SF2 (at least, did > not try SF3) soundfont:
I didn't even know this! I believed timidity was still bound to the pats format. > Iâve opened #920373 against timidity to have sourcing this, commented > out, added to the stock timidity configuration (which already shows > commented-out entries for several other soundfonts). If it is this easy to tell timidity use SF2 soundfonts then I agree we should prepare its package for this. - Fabian
